Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) Plot Summary
The long-awaited teaser trailer for JJ Abrams’ new Star Trek Into Darkness moving picture has finally been discharged, and i am unsuccessful by it. The promoting of this rebooted franchise very frustrates ME, as a result of they are still thus reticent to trumpet the STAR TREK-ness of the complete endeavour! And why is that, considering mass audiences responded thus completely to the primary movie? I found 2009’s Star Trek invigorating , spirited and nice fun. It serviceable the Trekkies, whereas drawing in a very recent audience due to its a lot of aggressive Star Wars-y visuals and scale. i do not suppose there is any reason to worry concerning promoting this sequel as a Star Trek moving picture currently, thus why is that the Into Darkness trailer cautious concerning showing United States the franchise’s painting mental imagery and sounds?
The USS Enterprise is clouded from read (literally, twice), the first colored uniforms are not noticeable, there aren’t any sound effects that instantly determine what the moving picture is… and even the “Into Darkness” suffix dominates the words “Star Trek” within the title. I suppose Chris Pine, Zoe Saldana and Simon Pegg’s faces would possibly trigger recognition that this can be a Star Trek sequel amongst the final public, however it isn’t all that obvious to anyone UN agency can be looking at this in a very cinema and hasn’t half-track it down on-line. (Yes, i do know the words STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS helpfully seem at the top, however you should not need to watch for that to know this can be a Star Trek moving picture IMO.)
This minute-long teaser places way more stress on a voice-over by Benedict Cumberbatch because the sequel’s villain, however they are still being uncommunicative concerning UN agency he is playing? It appears seemingly he is a really completely different interpretation of Khan (memorably vie by economic expert Montalban on the first TV program and its moving picture sequel Wrath of Khan), however there is still area for doubt. Why is that? Khan could be a character most of the people grasp, thus it’d have Lent the teaser further impact by a minimum of confirming Cumberbatch’s role as Captain Kirk’s nice nemesis.
By looking at this footage, you actually simply come back away knowing that there is an enormous sci-fi moving picture set within the future, wherever the BBC’s fictitious character is taking part in a terrorist. Is that enough? on behalf of me, no. I hope the complete theatrical trailer is a lot of forthcoming with the Star Trek-ness of the project. the primary movie’s trailer was completely joyous for a life-long fan of Trek, desirous to see its glory fixed up when the latter Next Generation movies killed it… however the sequel’s teaser could be a frustrating damp firework.
I have very little doubt the moving picture are fantastic, aren’t getting ME wrong, however I simply do not perceive the thinking behind however it’s marketed. i actually do not. Even the one-sheet poster owes a lot of to The Dark Knight Rises and will be any range of generic post-apocalyptic summer movies on the horizon. Star Trek is one amongst standard culture’s most enduring properties, thus why not market it while not a sense of embarrassment? It’s like they require to create general audiences go “wow, no matter this can be appearance impressive”, before dropping the punchline that “yes, this can be a Star Trek movie! are you able to believe that? i do know you liked the one with the whales wherever Benjamin Spock nerve-pinched that man with the ghetto-blaster on the bus, however currently it’s volcanic rock and bright makes a cameo!”.
STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS premieres could 2013. Written by Nuxe
Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) Credited Cast
Director: J.J. Abrams
Writers: Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman
Stars: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto and Zoe Saldana